| To: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Performance drop in Linux 2.4.19-XFS 1.2 ? |
| From: | Craig Tierney <ctierney@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:17:58 -0600 |
| Cc: | Cliff Wells <logiplex@xxxxxxxxx>, Ravi Wijayaratne <ravi_wija@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4.3.2.7.2.20030730213958.03e04578@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20030730204531.03df52f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730110055.041a1bc0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730110055.041a1bc0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730204531.03df52f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730213958.03e04578@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:43:50PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote: > At 13:24 30-7-2003 -0600, Craig Tierney wrote: > > >Sorry if this is a repeat, I haven't seen the whole > >thread. Did you try increasing the scsi max readahead? > > I found them already since new something like this existed in proc :-) > > > echo "511" > /proc/sys/vm/max-readahead > > echo "127" > /proc/sys/vm/min-readahead > > I used 512 and 128 but it works! Great. I used 2^n-1 becuase that is how they were set initially (31). Craig Craig Tierney (ctierney@xxxxxxxx) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Performance drop in Linux 2.4.19-XFS 1.2 ?, Seth Mos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Need help cannot repair or check XFS filesystem, onedj |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Performance drop in Linux 2.4.19-XFS 1.2 ?, Seth Mos |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Performance drop in Linux 2.4.19-XFS 1.2 ?, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |