| To: | Craig Tierney <ctierney@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Performance drop in Linux 2.4.19-XFS 1.2 ? |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2003 21:43:50 +0200 |
| Cc: | Cliff Wells <logiplex@xxxxxxxxx>, Ravi Wijayaratne <ravi_wija@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030730192438.GA6320@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20030730204531.03df52f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730110055.041a1bc0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730110055.041a1bc0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730204531.03df52f0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 13:24 30-7-2003 -0600, Craig Tierney wrote: Sorry if this is a repeat, I haven't seen the whole thread. Did you try increasing the scsi max readahead? I found them already since new something like this existed in proc :-) I used 512 and 128 but it works! Yay! This helps on my filesystems with Fibre Channel hardware. However, I have always had this problem. It didn't start with 2.4.20. I don't use Redhat kernels so maybe there is something that changed there. I think one of the defaults got botched during the RedHat errata patching. This isn't the first time they forgot something. I'll try the 1.3pre next and try this as well. If it has the same problem we should get it patched. Cheers -- Seth It might just be your lucky day, if you only knew. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Performance drop in Linux 2.4.19-XFS 1.2 ?, Craig Tierney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Performance drop in Linux 2.4.19-XFS 1.2 ?, Craig Tierney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Performance drop in Linux 2.4.19-XFS 1.2 ?, Craig Tierney |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Performance drop in Linux 2.4.19-XFS 1.2 ?, Craig Tierney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |