| Subject: | Re: Data Corruption Problem |
|---|---|
| From: | Jim Eshleman <jce0@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:49:42 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <H00000bb0040b8ce.1059579394.dlx101.dlh.st.com@MHS> |
| References: | <H00000bb0040b8ce.1059579394.dlx101.dlh.st.com@MHS> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314 |
I've been running XFS for about two years now, and have had my share of
problems, but haven't experienced any corruption. XFS has progressed by
"leaps and bounds" to the credit of the developers and users. If you
want to run a linux server, XFS is a good choice of fs IHMO.
For the record I'm running snapshot-xfs-2.4.21-2003-07-07_02:01_UTC on an IBM x370 8-way with 8GB (64G HIGHMEM enabled) and ~500GB disk, all HW RAID with Serveraid (ips) controllers. The system is a very busy campus mail server with ~10K users. LVM, NIS, NFS, POP, IMAP, sendmail, etc. Migrated to this system from an IBM F50 AIX system two years ago and have been happier since, although JFS on AIX is also a fine fs. Jim |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Data Corruption Problem, Net Llama! |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Performance drop in Linux 2.4.19-XFS 1.2 ?, Cliff Wells |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Data Corruption Problem, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Data Corruption Problem, Net Llama! |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |