xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Announce: XFS split patches for 2.4.21

To: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Announce: XFS split patches for 2.4.21
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 06 Jul 2003 21:58:10 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030707023702.GC1262@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <3489.1057544270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030707023702.GC1262@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 21:37, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 12:17:50PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> > Note: This is a respin as of 2.4.21-2003-07-07_02:01_UTC, it replaces
> >       the split patches that were done on 2003-06-23_01:45_UTC.  The
> >       latter patches contain bad XFS code and should not be used.
> 
> As stated in my previous email to the list, I'm using the split patches
> done on 2003-06-23_01:45_UTC with the xfs_globals.c patch posted on the
> list, which fixes the last two problems reported about the split
> patches. I'm curious: what "bad XFS code" remains (after
> xfs_globals.c.diff) that the respin fixes?

The globals stuff has been reworked again - to avoid shooting
ourselves in the foot like this in the future. Not a lot of 
other differences I think.

Steve



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>