xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Performance drop in Linux 2.4.19-XFS 1.2 ?

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Performance drop in Linux 2.4.19-XFS 1.2 ?
From: Craig Tierney <ctierney@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:17:58 -0600
Cc: Cliff Wells <logiplex@xxxxxxxxx>, Ravi Wijayaratne <ravi_wija@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20030730213958.03e04578@pop.xs4all.nl>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030730204531.03df52f0@pop.xs4all.nl> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730110055.041a1bc0@pop.xs4all.nl> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730110055.041a1bc0@pop.xs4all.nl> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730204531.03df52f0@pop.xs4all.nl> <4.3.2.7.2.20030730213958.03e04578@pop.xs4all.nl>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:43:50PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote:
> At 13:24 30-7-2003 -0600, Craig Tierney wrote:
> 
> >Sorry if this is a repeat, I haven't seen the whole
> >thread.  Did you try increasing the scsi max readahead?
> 
> I found them already since new something like this existed in proc :-)
> 
> >   echo "511" > /proc/sys/vm/max-readahead
> >    echo "127" > /proc/sys/vm/min-readahead
> 
> I used 512 and 128 but it works!

Great.  I used 2^n-1 becuase that is how they
were set initially (31).  

Craig

Craig Tierney (ctierney@xxxxxxxx)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>