On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 mahesh.babbar@xxxxxx wrote:
> Freinds,
>
> Please recall that a week before I put up a similar problem and I was
> told that the problem could be beause of the ancient code of XFS (2
> years old) I am running on my box.
>
> Answer was that new XFS code is stable, proven and works without any
> issues and there no *VERY CRITICAL* issues like data corruption.
>
> Aman's problem's source may have been different to mine but the
> bottomlime is that "There could still be a major stability issue even
> with newer XFS codes".
>
> Steve/Lonnie : I don't want to sound un-neccessarily finiky and I
> completely trust communitiy's ability to set things right, my only
> submission is that there could still be grey areas
And the moon might be blue on alternate sundays in June. Please don't
spread FUD. If you have evidence of a problem, then present it, against
the latest released stable XFS codebase. If not, then don't raise doubt
over something that you have a hunch on without any real evidence.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com
|