xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4

To: Thomas Seifert <thomas-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE XFS 1.3.0pre4
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Jul 2003 17:11:53 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030726000455.0737993a.thomas-lists@myphorum.com>
References: <1059169471.34654.113.camel@rose.americas.sgi.com> <20030726000455.0737993a.thomas-lists@myphorum.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
The patches only affect XFS.
The core kernel patches have not changed and will not change in the
foreseeable future.
They can be grabbed from:
ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/Release-1.3/kernel_patches/

Sorry for the confusion... I probably should have re-iterated the patch
release process.

On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 19:04, Thomas Seifert wrote:
> Just curious, maybe I missed something important but in the 
> kernel-patches-directory 
> there is no kernel-version given.
> So for which kernels are these patches at all?
> 
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> On 25 Jul 2003 16:44:32 -0500 Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The 1.3.0 pre4 patches and latest RH9 errata kernel rpms are
> > available at:
> > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/Release-1.3/pre4/
> > 
> > The 1.3 xfs-cmds have also been updated to TOT xfs-cmds, since
> > there is no real reason not to bring them in sync. In other works
> > no major code changes, just a lot of cleanups and minor bug fixes.
> > 
> > One significant update: xfs_copy is now installed by default.
> > 
> > The kernel rpm's themselves have not had much testing so use
> > at your own risk. 
> > 
> > As far as the xfs codes goes, it goes through nightly regression
> > testing.
> > 
> > As always please let us know of any issues.
> > If things go well pre4 should probably turn into actual XFS 1.3.0
> > 
> > -Russell Cattelan
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>