xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #3

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #3
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:07:24 -0800
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307212257400.17138-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com>
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20030722003443.GA13188@plato.local.lan> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307212257400.17138-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:00:24PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> We're very interested in this patch, we just have not had the time
> to fully vet it & get it applied to the tree.
> 
> If folks on the list who are interested in this sort of thing could give
> it a whirl, and report experiences, it would be helpful.
> 
> In general, the patch looks like a good thing, I/we just need some breathing
> space to really look at it before we apply it to CVS.

I still also want to know if these bits should be inherited by new
children of a directory with these bits set.

ext2 does this for all of them, IMO it only makes sense for SYNC.

> Thanks Ethan!

your welcome.

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgp5nvVWm9upQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>