xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [bug report]: chown(2) implementation in xfs is broken

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [bug report]: chown(2) implementation in xfs is broken
From: Robert Brockway <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 01:59:00 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <20030707053311.GX930@plato.local.lan>
References: <7kadbrchcp.fsf@greenplant.dot> <3F08C005.3070706@linux-sxs.org> <Pine.LNX.4.56.0307070055520.11005@zen.canint.timetraveller.org> <20030707053311.GX930@plato.local.lan>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Ethan Benson wrote:

> my previous mail i missed that you were doing this as non-root.  as

I probably should have been more explicit about that.

I'm actually surprised that xfs allows the liberal behaviour of
restrict_chown=0 at all (as a default or not).

The potential for abuse is significant.  It basically nullifies any use of
quotas since it allows any user to force any other user over-quota at any
time.  This could result in mail bounces and all sorts of mischief.

Is the option there for compatability with Irix, and if so, why does Irix
allow it?

Rob

-- 
Robert Brockway B.Sc. email: robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  ICQ: 104781119
Linux counter project ID #16440 (http://counter.li.org)
"The earth is but one country and mankind its citizens" -Baha'u'llah


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>