| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [bug report]: chown(2) implementation in xfs is broken |
| From: | Robert Brockway <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Jul 2003 01:59:00 -0400 (EDT) |
| In-reply-to: | <20030707053311.GX930@plato.local.lan> |
| References: | <7kadbrchcp.fsf@greenplant.dot> <3F08C005.3070706@linux-sxs.org> <Pine.LNX.4.56.0307070055520.11005@zen.canint.timetraveller.org> <20030707053311.GX930@plato.local.lan> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Ethan Benson wrote: > my previous mail i missed that you were doing this as non-root. as I probably should have been more explicit about that. I'm actually surprised that xfs allows the liberal behaviour of restrict_chown=0 at all (as a default or not). The potential for abuse is significant. It basically nullifies any use of quotas since it allows any user to force any other user over-quota at any time. This could result in mail bounces and all sorts of mischief. Is the option there for compatability with Irix, and if so, why does Irix allow it? Rob -- Robert Brockway B.Sc. email: robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ICQ: 104781119 Linux counter project ID #16440 (http://counter.li.org) "The earth is but one country and mankind its citizens" -Baha'u'llah |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Announce: XFS split patches for 2.4.21, Federico Sevilla III |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - xfsprogs update, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [bug report]: chown(2) implementation in xfs is broken, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [bug report]: chown(2) implementation in xfs is broken, Ethan Benson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |