| To: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0 |
| From: | "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:47:33 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Paulo Matos <pjsm@xxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1055367678.1925.59.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1055367400.11067.143.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1055367678.1925.59.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.7 |
Quoting Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > This would greatly help those of us possibly moving to ES or AS. :) Hmmm, do you think this would make Red Hat might be more "open" to including those core changes in its own kernels? I.e., as long as they didn't affect Ext3, but kept XFS itself separate. I am, of course, talking from a standpoint of great ignorance on the matter. So feel free to smack me straight. -- Bryan J. Smith, E.I. mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx http://thebs.org CCDA/CCNA CIWSA/MCIWA LPIC2/RHCE MCSA http://thebs.org/certs.pdf ----------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft(R): The 'Data Longevity is Optional' Company |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0, Bryan J. Smith |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0, Austin Gonyou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |