| To: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0 |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 11 Jun 2003 16:36:41 -0500 |
| Cc: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Paulo Matos <pjsm@xxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1055366915.1925.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20030610133612.0326eba0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1055366915.1925.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 16:28, Austin Gonyou wrote: > > Could it be possible to modularize the XFS? Kind of like an XFS > patch-less install? I dunno if that's possible, somewhat like how some > of these driver installers work now a days for linux? You need core kernel changes to support XFS... especially in 2.4.9! So a patch-less install.... nope. OTOH we are talking about distributing the next release in 2 packages, an "xfs-ready" kernel, and an xfs-module RPM. That way xfs can beupdated without a new kernel install, as long as the interface does not change. Not sure if we'll get this done, but I've been kicking it around. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. 651-683-3102 |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS feature request, Austin Gonyou |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0, Austin Gonyou |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0, Austin Gonyou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0, Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |