xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Jun 2003 16:28:35 -0500
Cc: Paulo Matos <pjsm@xxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20030610133612.0326eba0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Coremetrics, Inc.
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030610133612.0326eba0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 06:41, Seth Mos wrote:
> Yes, 7.3 it is. I have no boxes running anything newer. It looks like
> we 
> will be switching to Red Hat ES pretty soon for the database box which
> would mean that I can't use the XFS filesystem anymore since it is not
> covered by the support contract.
> 
> Some other boxes for which I do not care about the support anyways
> will 
> keep using XFS. That means I'll probably would need to make some sort
> of 
> installer for Red Hat ES with XFS support in order to install or
> upgrade.


Could it be possible to modularize the XFS? Kind of like an XFS
patch-less install? I dunno if that's possible, somewhat like how some
of these driver installers work now a days for linux?

> The biggest problem with ES is the use of the "ancient" 2.4.9 kernel
> with 
> more patches then you can shake a stick at.

If you check their .src.rpm which is freely available for that kernel,
you should see that they patch up to 2.4.18 I believe, with a ton of
other back-port stuff. 



-- 
Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Coremetrics, Inc.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>