| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.22-pre patches |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 25 Jun 2003 16:30:07 -0500 |
| Cc: | Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030625222235.A14214@infradead.org> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306251655530.13129@linux-sxs.org> <1056575954.2047.29.camel@laptop.americas.sgi.com> <20030625222235.A14214@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 16:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:19:08PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > > Your best bet is to take the xfs cvs kernel, and apply the 2.4.22-pre > > patch to it. Apart from kdb, it is usually pretty clean. > > I don't think it's that easy. 2.4.22-pre has the O_DIRECT changes from sct. > Fixing XFS so that it compiles isn't that difficult (just some conflicts > in filemap.c) but it's much more work to not cripple XFS O_DIRECT support > due to these new locks. Without any changes all O_DIRECT I/O would happen > with i_sem held now. Grr, forgot about that, I suppose we bounced off Marcello like water off a duck's back again - I saw you mention sending him infrastructure patches again? Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.22-pre patches, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.22-pre patches, Net Llama! |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.22-pre patches, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.22-pre patches, Net Llama! |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |