xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.22-pre patches

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.4.22-pre patches
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 22:22:35 +0100
Cc: Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1056575954.2047.29.camel@laptop.americas.sgi.com>; from lord@sgi.com on Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:19:08PM -0500
References: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306251655530.13129@linux-sxs.org> <1056575954.2047.29.camel@laptop.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:19:08PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 15:56, Net Llama! wrote:
> > Anyone know if/when the cvs snapshots will cleanly apply against the
> > 2.4.22-pre1 kernel?  I'd really like to use it, as the acpi support is
> > significantly better than what was in 2.4.21(-final).
> > 
> > -- 
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Lonni J Friedman                            netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo              http://netllama.ipfox.com
> > 
> 
> Your best bet is to take the xfs cvs kernel, and apply the 2.4.22-pre
> patch to it. Apart from kdb, it is usually pretty clean.

I don't think it's that easy.  2.4.22-pre has the O_DIRECT changes from sct.
Fixing XFS so that it compiles isn't that difficult (just some conflicts
in filemap.c) but it's much more work to not cripple XFS O_DIRECT support
due to these new locks.  Without any changes all O_DIRECT I/O would happen
with i_sem held now.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>