xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS as a module for RH AS or ES

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS as a module for RH AS or ES
From: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:00:26 -0400
Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <3EF9AEB7.1060501@myrealbox.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306251422390.1345-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 MultiZilla/v1.1.20
Eric Sandeen wrote:
Nicholas -

Any idea if they stripped just fs/xfs, or all of the xfs support
infrastructure?  (which is really not that much anymore).

Having an "xfs-ready" kernel would be a very nice thing, you could then
just load the module into it, even if they rm -rf'd fs/xfs.

Eric & Seth,

I'm really sorry for spreading that FUD earlier, apparently my interdiff was acting up and not accurately reporting differences (and I didn't actually look in the patch to verify xfs' removal). So, in actuality, they have NOT stripped the xfs from the -ac series patch. So, long story short, it is in there. Unfortunately, the kernel configs still indicate that they aren't building any kernels (boot or otherwise) with modular or builtin xfs support :-/. XFS-ready is better than nothing, I suppose. To reiterate, this seems to be only applicable to their forthcoming Enterprise (ES/AS) kernels. I have no idea what Arjan is going to do with the regular kernel, the current rawhide for it is quite featureless...

Cheers,
Nicholas

P.S. - Eric I can send you the source rpm I have, if you want. They took it off the mirrors, so you won't be able to get it there.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>