[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0

To: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.4.20-18 Red Hat errata kernel with XFS 1.2.0
From: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:47:33 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Paulo Matos <pjsm@xxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1055367678.1925.59.camel@portageek.digitalroadkill.net>
References: <1055367400.11067.143.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <1055367678.1925.59.camel@portageek.digitalroadkill.net>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.7
Quoting Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> This would greatly help those of us possibly moving to ES or AS. :)

Hmmm, do you think this would make Red Hat might be more "open" to including 
those core 
changes in its own kernels?  I.e., as long as they didn't affect Ext3, but kept 
XFS itself separate.

I am, of course, talking from a standpoint of great ignorance on the matter.  
So feel free to smack 
me straight.

Bryan J. Smith, E.I.  mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx  http://thebs.org
CCDA/CCNA CIWSA/MCIWA LPIC2/RHCE MCSA  http://thebs.org/certs.pdf
     Microsoft(R):  The 'Data Longevity is Optional' Company 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>