| To: | Robert Brockway <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Tomorrow |
| From: | Jer Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 27 May 2003 11:19:32 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305270026390.17955@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <1053694002.2887.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1053697162.21472.51.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030523134438.GC30288@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030523150530.A31022@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524071709.GK27626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524095245.A24074@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305270026390.17955@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
What about putting this into VFS and letting VFS use trusted extended attributes to store in on XFS, NTFS, ext2/3, whatever? .02 Jeremy On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 00:39, Robert Brockway wrote: > On Sat, 24 May 2003, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > seems like a sad thing to put such cruft into a decent filesystem just > > > to support a broken legacy OS. > > > > I will make sure it'll be a config option. > > Loadable module I trust :) > > While we're on the XFS wishlist, I think that implementation of > "immutable" and "append-only" attributes as seen in ext2/3 would be a > great boon for the filesystem. > > Cheers, > Rob (happy XFS user) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Tomorrow, Michael Sinz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 223] mounting xfs on raid0 in linux-2.5.62 triggers BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:2000, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Tomorrow, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Tomorrow, Ethan Benson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |