| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Tomorrow |
| From: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 May 2003 21:08:43 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305270026390.17955@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-copies-to: | nobody |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <1053694002.2887.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1053697162.21472.51.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030523134438.GC30288@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030523150530.A31022@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524071709.GK27626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524095245.A24074@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305270026390.17955@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:39:12AM -0400, Robert Brockway wrote: > On Sat, 24 May 2003, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > seems like a sad thing to put such cruft into a decent filesystem just > > > to support a broken legacy OS. > > > > I will make sure it'll be a config option. > > Loadable module I trust :) > > While we're on the XFS wishlist, I think that implementation of > "immutable" and "append-only" attributes as seen in ext2/3 would be a > great boon for the filesystem. yes it would be helpful. and not very difficult. (for someone familier with xfs internals). -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Tomorrow, Daniel Moore |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | kernel boot parameter "rootflags" and initrd, anon anon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Tomorrow, Daniel Moore |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Tomorrow, Jer Jackson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |