xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tomorrow

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tomorrow
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 19:13:58 -0800
In-reply-to: <1054004533.1170.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20030524071709.GK27626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524095245.A24074@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524091516.GM27626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524093103.GA12181@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524100441.GN27626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1053814283.4056.25.camel@holly> <20030524223508.GO27626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1054003505.1174.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030527025545.GE32642@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1054004533.1170.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:02:12PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-05-26 at 21:55, Ethan Benson wrote:
> 
> > 
> > well price you pay for using crud like windows..
> > 
> > anyway they should just use a broken case insensitive filesystem like
> > NTFS, or HFS+ for the smb export, rather then insist we cripple (or
> > cruftify) decent filesystems like XFS.
> > 
> 
> This stuff will not get in the way of normal operation, and there is
> a market for being an SMB server - and XFS runs on more than one
> operating system. Actually it is really not that much code.

so long as it can be turned off at compile time, and the broken
behavior is never default im happy.  still would rather see you guys
working on more important things. 

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgpdQfoKUdTEe.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>