xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tomorrow

To: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Tomorrow
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 26 May 2003 22:02:12 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030527025545.GE32642@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030523134438.GC30288@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030523150530.A31022@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524071709.GK27626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524095245.A24074@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524091516.GM27626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524093103.GA12181@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030524100441.GN27626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1053814283.4056.25.camel@holly> <20030524223508.GO27626@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1054003505.1174.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030527025545.GE32642@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2003-05-26 at 21:55, Ethan Benson wrote:

> 
> well price you pay for using crud like windows..
> 
> anyway they should just use a broken case insensitive filesystem like
> NTFS, or HFS+ for the smb export, rather then insist we cripple (or
> cruftify) decent filesystems like XFS.
> 

This stuff will not get in the way of normal operation, and there is
a market for being an SMB server - and XFS runs on more than one
operating system. Actually it is really not that much code.

Steve



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>