Re: bug? sv_wait() and gcc3

xfs

Re: bug? sv_wait() and gcc3

To:	Kelledin <kelledin+XFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: bug? sv_wait() and gcc3
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 12 May 2003 10:00:32 +0100
Cc:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200305101230.28794.kelledin+XFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from kelledin+XFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Sat, May 10, 2003 at 12:30:28PM -0500
References:	<200305101230.28794.kelledin+XFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.2.5.1i

> (Note that dropping back to gcc-2.95.3 is not really an option on 
> Alpha--2.95.3 tends to ICE when compiling SMP Alpha kernels.  
> It's basically gcc3 or bust, and i'd prefer 3.2.1.)

Sorry if I can help you with any of the other questions, but I'd
strongly suggestion updating to gcc 3.2.3 if you want to use gcc3.
There have been lots of bugs fixed and unless I got something totally
wrong earlier gcc3 versions had a few issues on alpha.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
bug? sv_wait() and gcc3, Kelledin Re: bug? sv_wait() and gcc3, Christoph Hellwig <= Re: bug? sv_wait() and gcc3, Kelledin Re: bug? sv_wait() and gcc3, Steve Lord Re: bug? sv_wait() and gcc3, Kelledin

Previous by Date:	Zero filled files, Axel Thimm
Next by Date:	Re: Zero filled files, Steve Lord
Previous by Thread:	bug? sv_wait() and gcc3, Kelledin
Next by Thread:	Re: bug? sv_wait() and gcc3, Kelledin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]