xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS and MD devices.

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS and MD devices.
From: Daniel Pittman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:14:22 +1000
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030429225008.GA653@frodo> (Nathan Scott's message of "Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:50:08 +1000")
References: <87sms1jtot.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <yq11xzlwfab.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030429225008.GA653@frodo>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) XEmacs/21.5 (cabbage)
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 10:26:36AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>> >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Pittman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> Daniel> I think tried to create an XFS filesystem on it and,
>> Daniel> annoyingly, got told that my MD array was not clean.
>> 
>> Hrm, I agree that the degraded RAID1 case is valid.  As long as the
>> array is operational, we shouldn't care.  Printing the warning would
>> suffice.
>> 
>> Nathan?
> 
> This has been the behavior for a couple of weeks now (since the
> 2.4.6 version of xfsprogs).

Thanks. I note I didn't mention that this was the Debian 2.4.4 package.

Anyway, it's good to know that other people will not have the same
problem I did.

        Daniel

-- 
I wish I had boobs. Not enough to buy them, though.
        -- Lara Flynn Boyle


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>