| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: More processes hanging in 'D' state. |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:36:48 +1000 |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2003 07:27:09 EST." <200304280727.09990.kelledin+XFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 07:27:09 -0500, Kelledin <kelledin+XFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >As I mentioned in my last post, >if the deadlock gets hit, allocating or unlinking an inode on >the same fs as the deadlocked process breaks out of the >deadlock. Does a sync command break out as well? IOW, do you have to change the hung filesystem or is it enough just to kick the disk? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: More processes hanging in 'D' state., Kelledin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: More processes hanging in 'D' state., Kelledin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: More processes hanging in 'D' state., Kelledin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: More processes hanging in 'D' state., Kelledin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |