| To: | Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and filesytem shutdown (was: Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released) |
| From: | Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:18:54 +0200 |
| Cc: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, chris@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <3E9EC641.6050901@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3E9F7422.4060108@xxxxxxxxxx> <3E9F87D8.6070904@xxxxxxxxxxx> <3EA01003.6090604@xxxxxxxxxx> <1050851772.2928.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3EA5FDDC.6090707@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20030423064110.GA3172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 |
Axel Thimm wrote: On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 09:43:40PM -0500, Russell Cattelan wrote:I think the problem it when the files are copied to /boot/grub and not necessarilywhen grub is installed. I still thing the best it to do a remount,ro then a remount,rw the remount read only code has special code to sync the fs.I still wonder what is different at install time vs later. Why doesn't the XFS /boot cope with that correctly, and why should XFS later do the right thing with /usr /home etc.? I don't want to sound negative, I like to use XFS, but this makes me feel very uncomfortable. :( I get the same feeling - Why doesn't the filesystem push data and metadata to disk when it gets a sync? It surely can't be a "performance" thing? // Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | XFS and filesytem shutdown (was: Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released), Axel Thimm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Redhat 9 - grub wont boot with XFS root fs after migration, Gareth Blades |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS and filesytem shutdown (was: Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released), Axel Thimm |
| Next by Thread: | PARTIAL TAKE 887385 - Fix addresses in error messages, Nathan Straz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |