xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Not copying all files

To: brettholcomb@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Not copying all files
From: Mogens Kjaer <mk@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 08:49:18 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <auto-000010878681@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3E9919E9.2050702@xxxxxx> <auto-000101562274@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
These files were NOT hard links. They were actual files.
Any ideas what is happening?

No.

The reason I asked about the hardlinks was that I've
seen tar failing in this case a couple of RH versions
ago. E.g. if you do a:

$ cd /usr/bin
$ ls -li perl*
 327730 -rwxr-xr-x    2 root     root      13798 Sep  2  2002 perl
 327730 -rwxr-xr-x    2 root     root      13798 Sep  2  2002 perl5.8.0
 327714 -rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root      36812 Sep  2  2002 perlbug
 327715 -rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root      19003 Sep  2  2002 perlcc
 327716 -rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root      21836 Sep  2  2002 perldoc
 327717 -rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root      11664 Sep  2  2002 perlivp

you can see that perl and perl5.8.0 are referring to the
same inode number, 327730. Only one of the files were
restored by tar, which gave major problems...

But this doesn't look like it in your case.

Mogens

--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08
Email: mk@xxxxxx Homepage: http://www.crc.dk


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>