I also just noticed that xfsdump-2.2.9-1 depends on the attr package.
Should it not depend on the libattr1 package, since some of the executables
are linked against it? Or does something actually call the commands in the
attr package...
Regards,
Jeremy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Jackson" <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 6:07 PM
Subject: xfsdump debian packages on woody
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to recompile the latest debian xfsdump package (2.2.9-1) on a
> fresh Debian woody install. I recompile xfsprogs and install first. But
> it wants libattr1-dev instead of attr-dev (I have stable=2.0.7-1
installed).
> running dpkg-buildpackage with -d lets it build just fine. I notice in
> 2.2.4-1 you switched the dependency. If I change debian/control from:
>
> Build-depends: ... , libattr1-dev, ...
>
> to:
>
> Build-depends: ..., attr-dev | libattr1-dev, ....
>
> it builds without the -d and without complaining.
>
> Q: is it just a name change of the -dev package, or is the version
critical?
>
> Are there any know issues with using xfs 1.2.0 and userspace utilities
with
> attr-2.0.7-1?
>
> It would be nice if you could add the attr-dev back in, or put in the
> minimum version required into debian/control, in your next package
release.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jeremy
>
>
|