The installer isn't "official" in terms of we only put as much
support effort into it as we have time for. If minor things are
broken typically we won't bother trying to fix them unless it's a
trivial fix.
The installer is useful enough internally that we will keep doing them
as long as we are inflicted into to using RH.
On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 11:53, Richard Houston wrote:
> My sincerest apologies Eric. I did not know it was not an official XFS
> installer and I surely did not want to sound like I was making an
> accusation and it defiantly sounds like I was. Sorry!!
>
> Like I said before, matter not if it is office or not as long as it
> works. ;) Keep up the great work.
>
> Thanks
>
> Rich
>
> On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 11:29, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 11:14, Richard Houston wrote:
> > > Funny that hey say 7.3 was the last on yet the ftp site has RH 8.0 XFS
> > > V4 installer. I am not really concerned with if it is office just as
> > > long as it works. ;)
> >
> > lest I be accused of breaking promises, I -did- stop after the RH 7.3
> > installer. Russell did the 8.0 installer. :)
> >
> > But if anyone wants to pick up the installer manufacturing duties, it
> > would certainly leave more time for us to do real work on the
> > filesystem. Looks like the DVD effort is a very good start.
> >
> > -Eric
--
Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|