| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfsrepair: rebuilding directory inode 128 |
| From: | Christian Guggenberger <Christian.Guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:16:27 +0200 |
| Cc: | Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030410034316.GB1338@xxxxxxxx>; from cw@xxxxxxxx on Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 05:43:16 +0200 |
| References: | <20030409120252.A29309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030409224118.GA759@frodo> <1049937908.538.3.camel@bonnie79> <20030410034316.GB1338@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 10.04.2003 05:43 Chris Wedgwood wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 03:25:08AM +0200, Christian Guggenberger wrote: > Is there a way to double check if it's the directory you mean ( > maybe xfs_db, but I'm not familiar with the whole lotta 'bout that > command)? Mount it, "ls -li" will show the inode number. I'm pretty sure 128 _has_ to be the root inode, I've not seen any exceptions. yep, it is the root-inode. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs for solaris?, Harri Haataja |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfsrepair: rebuilding directory inode 128, Christian Guggenberger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsrepair: rebuilding directory inode 128, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - Merge up to 2.5.67, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |