| To: | Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Melekhov <dm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | re[2]: filesystem size difference ? ;-) |
| From: | Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:15:42 -0400 |
| Cc: | XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Norcross Group |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Dmitry Melekhov wrote: >> > Certanly, I'll write to Suse mail list about this problem... >> > >> Please do that. And add me to CC. In new Suse Linux 8.2 is kernel 2.4.20 >> with XFS 1.2. Can you test this one? >> jan Jan, You seem to be a SuSE expert. In SuSE 8.0 xfs 1.1 was experimental and did not really work very well. (i.e. xfsrestore of acls and xfs/lvm snapshots both had issues.) I think XFS 1.1 was still experimental in 8.1. Do you know if xfs 1.2 is officially supported in 8.2, or is it still experimental? Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: fsck.xfs not found, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | re: Not copying all files, Greg Freemyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov |
| Next by Thread: | re[2]: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Jan Derfinak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |