| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: More processes hanging in 'D' state. |
| From: | Kelledin <kelledin+XFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Apr 2003 07:47:09 -0500 |
| Cc: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <18352.1051533408@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> |
| References: | <18352.1051533408@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.5.1 |
On Monday 28 April 2003 07:36 am, Keith Owens wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 07:27:09 -0500, > > Kelledin <kelledin+XFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >As I mentioned in my last post, > >if the deadlock gets hit, allocating or unlinking an inode on > >the same fs as the deadlocked process breaks out of the > >deadlock. > > Does a sync command break out as well? IOW, do you have to > change the hung filesystem or is it enough just to kick the > disk? Appending to a file doesn't help, nor does reading a file. I apparently have to either create or remove a file before the deadlock breaks. Haven't tried a sync though. -- Kelledin "If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does it still cost four figures to fix?" |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: More processes hanging in 'D' state., Keith Owens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfs_bmap is unable to handle options, Jan Derfinak |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: More processes hanging in 'D' state., Keith Owens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: More processes hanging in 'D' state., Kelledin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |