| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS kernel oops in 2.4.18 with XFS Rel 1.1 - known bug? Suggested upgrade path? Dead hard disk? |
| From: | xfs-ml <xfs-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:07:00 +1000 |
| In-reply-to: | <20030424130456.GB12209@sgi.com> |
| References: | <20030424115528.GB3325@immersive20.iii.rmit.edu.au> <20030424130456.GB12209@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
> Could you try the XFS 1.2 release kernel? To install XFS Rel 1.2, would I be right in assuming: -Use patch files: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.2/kernel_patches/linux-2.4.19-core-xfs-1.2.0.patch.gz ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/Release-1.2/kernel_patches/linux-2.4.19-xfs-1.2.0.patch.gz -I need to use Linux Kernel 2.4.19 -Given choice of gcc 2.95.4 and gcc 3.2.3 I should use 2.95.4 -As I am using debian 'sid', to keep things debian friendly I should: -Get kernel source -Apply patch to source -make menuconfig -make-kpkg ... -dpkg -i ... Using a kernel compiled using the above steps - would I still need to consider a patch for ptrace bug? Anyone know which one to use for 2.4.19? ADFH |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsdump problem, brett holcomb |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS kernel oops in 2.4.18 with XFS Rel 1.1 - known bug? Suggested upgrade path? Dead hard disk?, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS kernel oops in 2.4.18 with XFS Rel 1.1 - known bug? Suggested upgrade path? Dead hard disk?, Nathan Straz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS kernel oops in 2.4.18 with XFS Rel 1.1 - known bug? Suggested upgrade path? Dead hard disk?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |