Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-)

["Dmitry Melekhov" <dm@xxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Cox" <danscox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Dmitry Melekhov" <dm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "XFS Mailing List" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-)


> Dmitry,
>
> On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 11:37, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
> > And if I try to copy info to it it becomes full:
> > Any ideas?
>
> Do you have files with holes that the copy routine "populates"?


I don't know :-( But all files were copied over smb to old server, i.e.
the same way, I try to copy from old server to new.
IMHO, there is some difference in kernels.
For instance, I tried to remove all acls on some dir on old server with
2.4.20 from kernel.org + xfs.
before setfacl -R -b asuconnect
/dev/vg02/lvasuconnect
                        355648    337128     18520  95%
/home/samba/docs/asuconnect
after:

/dev/vg02/lvasuconnect
                        355648    323852     31796  92%
/home/samba/docs/asuconnect



The same directory on new server (Suse's 2.4.19) , certanly, files take more
space :-(
before setfacl -R -b asuconnect

/dev/vga3/lvavp          60736     44440     16296  74% /home/samba/avp
/dev/vga3/lvasuconnect
                        355648    337300     18348  95%
/home/samba/docs/asuconnect

after:
/dev/vga3/lvasuconnect
                        355648    337300     18348  95%
/home/samba/docs/asuconect

No difference!!!
Very strange...


Only question - is this difference between Suse xfs ;-)  and SGI xfs or
between 2.4.19 and 2.4.20.