Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-)

To:	Dmitry Melekhov <dm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-)
From:	Danny Cox <danscox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	23 Apr 2003 11:40:01 -0400
Cc:	XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<000f01c309ae$38170ca0$141ea8c0@dm>
Organization:	No Organization at ALL
References:	<000f01c309ae$38170ca0$141ea8c0@dm>
Sender:	linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

Dmitry,

On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 11:37, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
> And if I try to copy info to it it becomes full:
> Any ideas?

        Do you have files with holes that the copy routine "populates"?

-- 
kernel, n.: A part of an operating system that preserves the
medieval traditions of sorcery and black art.

Danny

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Eric Sandeen Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Danny Cox <= Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Jan Derfinak Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Jan Derfinak Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Juri Haberland Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Nathan Straz Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov re[2]: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Greg Freemyer re[2]: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Jan Derfinak

Previous by Date:	TAKE - merge up to 2.5.68, Steve Lord
Next by Date:	RE: Redhat 9 - grub wont boot with XFS root fs after migration, Gareth Blades
Previous by Thread:	Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov
Next by Thread:	Re: filesystem size difference ? ;-), Dmitry Melekhov
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]