| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Meaning of effective permissions |
| From: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Apr 2003 13:49:06 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <057889C7F1E5D61193620002A537E86946811C@NCBDC> |
| Mail-copies-to: | nobody |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <057889C7F1E5D61193620002A537E86946811C@NCBDC> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 12:05:07PM -0700, Marc Kaplan wrote: > Ethan Benson wrote: > > so if you have an acl giving `luser' rw- permissions to a file, but > > the mask is r-- `luser' will only have r-- access to the file. no one > > may have more permissions then granted by the mask. > I don't believe it's true that no one may have more permissions then granted > by the mask. It is my understanding that u:: (file owner) and o:: (other) > are not affected by the mask. right, because those are controlled by standard unix permissions. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Meaning of effective permissions, Marc Kaplan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.5.x CVS tree mostly empty?, Michael Sinz |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Meaning of effective permissions, Marc Kaplan |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Meaning of effective permissions, Marc Kaplan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |