xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: xfsrepair: rebuilding directory inode 128

from [Christian Guggenberger] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfsrepair: rebuilding directory inode 128
From: Christian Guggenberger <Christian.Guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:16:27 +0200
Cc: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030410034316.GB1338@f00f.org>; from cw@f00f.org on Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 05:43:16 +0200
References: <20030409120252.A29309@pc9391.uni-regensburg.de> <20030409224118.GA759@frodo> <1049937908.538.3.camel@bonnie79> <20030410034316.GB1338@f00f.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 10.04.2003 05:43 Chris Wedgwood wrote: 
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 03:25:08AM +0200, Christian Guggenberger wrote:

> Is there a way to double check if it's the directory you mean (
> maybe xfs_db, but I'm not familiar with the whole lotta 'bout that
> command)?

Mount it, "ls -li" will show the inode number.  I'm pretty sure 128
_has_ to be the root inode, I've not seen any exceptions.

yep, it is the root-inode.


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: xfs for solaris?, Harri Haataja
Next by Date:  Re: xfsrepair: rebuilding directory inode 128, Christian Guggenberger
Previous by Thread:  Re: xfsrepair: rebuilding directory inode 128, Nathan Scott
Next by Thread:  TAKE - Merge up to 2.5.67, Christoph Hellwig
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]