| To: | James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: using lseek() on large files |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Apr 2003 20:48:48 +0100 |
| Cc: | XFS mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.50.0304071343430.30028-100000@universe.chowhouse.com>; from james@chowhouse.com on Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 01:46:43PM -0600 |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.50.0304071343430.30028-100000@universe.chowhouse.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 01:46:43PM -0600, James Rich wrote: > Is it correct the xfs supports file sizes larger than can be addressed by > lseek()? lseek() uses a long as the offset, it takes an off_t as argument, not a long. off_t can be 64bit if you set the right options. (Try adding -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to CFLAGS) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | using lseek() on large files, James Rich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: using lseek() on large files, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | using lseek() on large files, James Rich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: using lseek() on large files, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |