| To: | cattelan@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Acl's Makefile rm patch |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:23:19 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1048821314.11608.16.camel@viena> |
| References: | <1048819921.11523.6.camel@viena> <20030328025338.GI887@frodo> <1048821314.11608.16.camel@viena> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 09:15:13PM -0600, Alvaro Figueroa wrote: > On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 20:53, Nathan Scott wrote: > > > No, these are created as symlinks, not directories, so -f is > > not the right thing to do here. > > Well, I have the CVS version from today, and they are directories. They > even hace a "CVS" directory in them :). > Ah, well - I wondered if reinstating those deleted entries in the cvs view might have some odd side-effects. These two at least need to not be there in the cvs tree. Probably not fatal though, just confusing for the cvs punters. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Acl's Makefile rm patch, Alvaro Figueroa |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: kernel patch fail with LVM, Rocky Lee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Acl's Makefile rm patch, Alvaro Figueroa |
| Next by Thread: | [Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Bogus ";" on debian/rules, Alvaro Figueroa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |