xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Acl's Makefile rm patch

To: cattelan@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Acl's Makefile rm patch
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:23:19 +1100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1048821314.11608.16.camel@viena>
References: <1048819921.11523.6.camel@viena> <20030328025338.GI887@frodo> <1048821314.11608.16.camel@viena>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 09:15:13PM -0600, Alvaro Figueroa wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 20:53, Nathan Scott wrote:
> 
> > No, these are created as symlinks, not directories, so -f is
> > not the right thing to do here.
> 
> Well, I have the CVS version from today, and they are directories. They
> even hace a "CVS" directory in them :).
> 

Ah, well - I wondered if reinstating those deleted entries
in the cvs view might have some odd side-effects.  These two
at least need to not be there in the cvs tree.  Probably not
fatal though, just confusing for the cvs punters.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>