xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Acl's Makefile rm patch

from [Alvaro Figueroa] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Acl's Makefile rm patch
From: Alvaro Figueroa <fede2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 27 Mar 2003 21:15:13 -0600
In-reply-to: <20030328025338.GI887@frodo>
References: <1048819921.11523.6.camel@viena> <20030328025338.GI887@frodo>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 20:53, Nathan Scott wrote:

> No, these are created as symlinks, not directories, so -f is
> not the right thing to do here.

Well, I have the CVS version from today, and they are directories. They
even hace a "CVS" directory in them :).

(BTW, can you please loose the CC. Thanks.)

-- 
Alvaro Figueroa
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  TAKE - minor cleanups, Nathan Scott
Next by Date:  Re: [Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Acl's Makefile rm patch, Nathan Scott
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Acl's Makefile rm patch, Nathan Scott
Next by Thread:  Re: [Trivial][Patch][CVS version] Acl's Makefile rm patch, Nathan Scott
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]