xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kernel patch fail with LVM

To: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: kernel patch fail with LVM
From: "Rocky Lee" <rocky_lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 15:34:39 +0800
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <002401c2f418$163e4f90$c70aa8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030327061815.GG5658@frodo>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Nathan 

Thank you for the respone!  .... :)

Did you mean that I've to change the LVM patch?
it sound a big trouble to me (beginner)...  but I'll try.... : P

I've also found the new 2.4.20 patch. (Mar. 18)
is that the release stable patch file?

Have a nice day ^_^

Rocky

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@xxxxxxx>
To: "Rocky Lee" <rocky_lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: kernel patch fail with LVM
> 
> We have Jan Kara's 32 bit quota patches in our tree, because
> we make use of some quota extensions they provide.  The LVM
> patch most likely is just for a stock-standard 2.4.20, which
> does not have these patches.
> 
> So, Jan's patches contain a change which removes DQUOT_SYNC
> and instead splits the functionality into a DQUOT_SYNC_DEV
> and a DQUOT_SYNC_SB - you'll need to change the code (looks
> like fsync_dev_lockfs needs this change) to make use of one
> of these new macros.
> 
> cheers.
> 
> -- 
> Nathan
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>