| To: | Matt Schillinger <mschilli@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS 1.1 vs. 1.2 |
| From: | Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Mar 2003 07:34:12 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Sauter AG, Basel |
| References: | <1048618954.22460.5.camel@mosix> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Matt Schillinger schrieb: > > Could someone tell me if it is worthwhile to use 1.2 over 1.1? Short answer: yes! Simon > > I have dev systems that are about to become production file servers.. I > am wondering if there are major benefits to 1.2 over 1.1.. > > particularly data integrity benefits, better prevention of log > corruption.. performance of course is great also.. > > Thanks for the help, > -- > Matt Schillinger > > mschilli@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: update: Re: XFS 1.2 bug?, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Question about upgrade to XFS 1.2, roberto |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS 1.1 vs. 1.2, Matt Schillinger |
| Next by Thread: | XFS: unknown mount option [usrquota], Jeffrey E. Hundstad |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |