| To: | Soon-Son Kwon <kss@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: low level access path for xfs operation |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:14:23 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030321124047.A26767@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from kss@xxxxxxxx on Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:40:47PM +0900 |
| References: | <20030321124047.A26767@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:40:47PM +0900, Soon-Son Kwon wrote: > Hi xfs folks: > Could anyone please let me know the following > xfs internal operation details? > > I would like to know if there is any operation > that bypasses submit_bio() when accessing the > lower level block devices. No, there is no such operation. > I want to add some function whenever the filesystem > tries to modify any block and concluded that submit_bio() > seems to be the lowest entry point for such operations. You might want to rewrite a block remapper like dm or md instead of modifying core core.. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ultra 320 and XFS, Simon Matter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: low level access path for xfs operation, Soon-Son Kwon |
| Previous by Thread: | low level access path for xfs operation, Soon-Son Kwon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: low level access path for xfs operation, Soon-Son Kwon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |