xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: What happened to the linux-2.4-xfs cvs tree?

To: Michael Sinz <msinz@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: What happened to the linux-2.4-xfs cvs tree?
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 18 Mar 2003 08:24:40 -0600
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, Nicholas Wourms <nwourms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Bruce Bauman <bbauman@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3E770742.4040904@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization:
References: <3E764CA8.5050404@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030318004530.GC948@frodo> <3E770742.4040904@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 05:47, Michael Sinz wrote:
> Nathan Scott wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 05:31:04PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> > 
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I just went to pull the sources from the linux-2.4-xfs tree 
> >>and I noticed it is gone for both cvs and cvsweb.  Was this 
> >>intentional?  Will it be back?
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > Pfft - not sure what's happened there.  I sure hope it comes back,
> > we'll probably have to wait for Russell to do his magic though.
> > 
> > The latest commands code is also mirrored below the 2.5.x-xfs part
> > of the CVS tree, so you can at least still get access to that in
> > the interim.
> 
> I run a local (for our use) mirror using rsync from your CVS tree and
> a whole bunch of the 2.4 tree has been blown away - specifically,
> all of the linux/fs, net, kdb, include, lib, mm, and scripts directories
> are empty (there are no ",v" files in them, just sub directories.)
> 
> The 2.5 tree seems to still be ok for now...

These CVS trees are actually recreated from scratch everytime they
are updated. The originals of all this stuff are still here, just
something in the process of pushing it out to oss is badly broken
by the sound of it.

Hopefully it will get fixed today.

Steve

-- 

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>