| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem |
| From: | Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:23:55 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <3E6B63DE.9040308@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303082125320.12835-100000@sparrow> <20030309141832.GT13846@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <3E6B63DE.9040308@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
On 2003-03-09 16:55:10+0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: > I'm sorry, I missed the sign around your neck saying "Troll". > > You could put that in your sig for instance so that it's readily apparent. Funny, I don't see a useful reply to his question from you on the list. Perhaps it got lost somewhere? Pardon me for being harsh towards Red Hat for shipping a broken compiler, but if you have such a problem with the tone of my reply, may I kindly suggest that you answer such questions about the infamous gcc 2.96 "release" yourself next time? If you feel a need for additional argumentation, please follow up in private; discussions like this are a waste of mailing list bandwidth. Thanks, -- Wessel Dankers <wsl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem, Stefan Smietanowski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LBA to File?, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS in 2.5.64-bk3, compile problem, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |