xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LBA to File?

from [Steve Lord] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Bogdan Costescu <bogdan.costescu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LBA to File?
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 07 Mar 2003 09:17:55 -0600
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, "Buzbee, James" <James.Buzbee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303071512590.30312-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization:
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303071512590.30312-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 08:43, Bogdan Costescu wrote:

> 
> No, you'r right, possibly the fastest solution is to have a fast SCSI disk 
> only for the journal and a replacement disk at hand.

Actually the fastest solution is to have a partitioned solid state
device you use for logs - battery backed ram, definitely not flash.
Unfortunately xfs cannot share logs between filesystems so if you put
several on a drive dedicated to logs you are in for a lot of head
seeking.

Steve

-- 

Steve Lord                                      voice: +1-651-683-3511
Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software         email: lord@xxxxxxx
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LBA to File?, Ingo Juergensmann
Next by Date:  Re: LBA to File?, Buzbee, James
Previous by Thread:  Re: LBA to File?, Bogdan Costescu
Next by Thread:  Re: LBA to File?, Charles Shannon Hendrix
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]