| To: | Gabor Forgacs <gabor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: direct io performance problem |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:32:32 +0000 |
| Cc: | xfs mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <00ab01c2e3f5$2d5cbbe0$0104a8c0@avalanche>; from gabor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 04:29:27PM +0100 |
| References: | <007001c2e3eb$9ff13500$0104a8c0@avalanche> <20030306144105.A10089@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <00ab01c2e3f5$2d5cbbe0$0104a8c0@avalanche> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 04:29:27PM +0100, Gabor Forgacs wrote: > hi christoph > > which rpms do you advice could you point me there (we use rpm)? > thank you RedHat-based: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/Release-1.2/kernel_rpms/2.4.18-18-RH/ SuSE: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/RPM/ Note that the RedHAT RPMs are not based on their latest errata, there are people who have patches their latest errata kernels with XFS, but Redat disabled O_DIRECT in never kernels, so you'll have to decide whether you want their latests fix, working O_DIRECT or hack the kernel yourself. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: direct io performance problem, Gabor Forgacs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - tweak io completion thread count again, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: direct io performance problem, Gabor Forgacs |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - tweak io completion thread count again, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |