xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

2.4.20 CVS

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 2.4.20 CVS
From: Joshua Schmidlkofer <menion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 26 Mar 2003 20:34:04 -0800
Organization:
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hey there all,

  Formerly the CVS tree contained the most recent pre- style patches,
but this behaviour ceased.  I am happy the way it is, but I wanted to
know if it is safe to use.   I like the 2.4.20 kernel - because of the
Intel driver inclusion, but I want to make sure that it is not a foolish
mistake to use the cvs tree. [for 2.4]

thanks,
  Joshua

p.s. I am using the linux-2.4-xfs tree.   

-- 
VB programmers ask why no one takes them seriously, 
it's somewhat akin to a McDonalds manager asking employees 
why they don't take their 'career' seriously.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 2.4.20 CVS, Joshua Schmidlkofer <=