xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS vs. ext3

To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS vs. ext3
From: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:16:18 -0500
Cc: linux-list@xxxxxxx, ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030226150442.GC23962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>, linux-list@xxxxxxx, ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20030226044329.GP2107@xxxxxxx> <20030226150442.GC23962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:04:42AM -0500,
Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> Out of curiosity, what was the configuration of the Samba
> server?  How much memory, CPU, disks, etc.?  Specifically, was
> it an SMP machine?

Nope, it's not SMP.  Specs:

Single processor Pentium III 800MHz
768MB RAM
ASUS CUBX rev 1.02 MB
6 Maxtor 120GB 5400rpm HDs
1 Onboard ATA66 CMD648 controller
2 Promise PCI ATA100 100TX/2 controllers (20268 chipset)
Intel 1000BaseT server NIC

Partitioned like so:

md2 (data array I was writing to) :
      active raid5 hde4[0] hdg4[1] hdi4[2] hdk4[3] hdm4[4] hdo4[5]
      592433920 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 0 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
      
md0 (root array) :
      active raid5 hde3[0] hdg3[1] hdi3[2] hdk3[3] hdm3[4] hdo3[5]
      5243520 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 0 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
      
md1 (boot array) :
      active raid1 hde1[0] hdg1[1]
      131392 blocks [2/2] [UU]

Andrew Klaassen


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>