xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Bug 218] Probable mmap() bug that breaks cpp-3.2
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:39:41 -0800
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-master@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1046210402.31695.2021.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200302251918.h1PJI2LZ024311@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20030225213859.GB22042@xxxxxxxx> <1046209514.31698.2000.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030225215141.GA22195@xxxxxxxx> <1046210402.31695.2021.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:00:03PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote:

> Nope, old kernel created bad files, confused cpp in gcc 3.2, new
> kernel does not generate these files. mapcheck fixes up old files

might xfs_check / xfs_repair not also be a candidate for trying to
find such files?  ie.  check a few at random (maybe using ctime/mtime
hints) or a command-line option to 'look harder'

or would such code be unacceptable as it would be pointless for the
IRIX codebase?



  --cw


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>