Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2

[Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Russell Cattelan wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 14:22, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
>
> > Can someone please inform me about something..
> >
> > The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and 
> > libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains 
> > acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19 and libacl-devel-2.0.19. Why?
> > Also, The attr package version is 2.0.11-0 in the installer image but 
> > 2.0.12-0 on the ftp site. Again, why? Same name issue exists (attr-devel 
> > vs libattr-devel).
> > // Stefan
> The re-spin of the installer was done in about an hour.
> I probably missed updating my build scripts with the
> new names/versions.
> If I find some time I'll look at fixing that but no promises.
Thanx. Why I asked was that maybe it was done on purpose for some 
reason. I'm just finalizing my DVD based on 1.2..
// Stefan