| To: | Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 |
| From: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 17 Feb 2003 14:59:16 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3E51449A.5000502@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <3E51449A.5000502@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 14:22, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: > Can someone please inform me about something.. > > The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and > libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains > acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19 and libacl-devel-2.0.19. Why? > > Also, The attr package version is 2.0.11-0 in the installer image but > 2.0.12-0 on the ftp site. Again, why? Same name issue exists (attr-devel > vs libattr-devel). > > // Stefan The re-spin of the installer was done in about an hour. I probably missed updating my build scripts with the new names/versions. If I find some time I'll look at fixing that but no promises. -- Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2, Stefan Smietanowski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |