xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2

To: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 17 Feb 2003 14:59:16 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3E51449A.5000502@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization:
References: <3E51449A.5000502@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 14:22, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> Can someone please inform me about something..
> 
> The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and 
> libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains 
> acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19 and libacl-devel-2.0.19. Why?
> 
> Also, The attr package version is 2.0.11-0 in the installer image but 
> 2.0.12-0 on the ftp site. Again, why? Same name issue exists (attr-devel 
> vs libattr-devel).
> 
> // Stefan
The re-spin of the installer was done in about an hour.
I probably missed updating my build scripts with the
new names/versions.
If I find some time I'll look at fixing that but no promises.

-- 
Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>